In my book, The Choice by Nicholas Sparks, Sparks decides to
take a brave role in the narration. He narrates the book in his own voice. It
can sometimes become annoying to listen to the narrator’s voice. At some points
it becomes unlikable to hear his opinion and connections to the story. But at
the same time I like how the focus on the characters changes with each chapter.
For example in the first chapter he looks in on Travis. But in the second
chapter he focuses in on Gabby. In this case I would have to agree with Wiener because
my book can sometimes be hard to read just because the narrator is unlikable. I
also believe that in a Romance novel it should be in the point of view of one
of the characters because they reveal their full emotions which bring out more
emotions in the reader. When Sparks
talks about the characters he only reveals some of what their feeling. So you
only get a vague idea about how strongly they feel about one another. I also
feel like since I don’t like the narrator as much I can’t relate to the story
or the characters. I feel like I’m sitting on bleachers watching a silent play.
It makes me feel like some words are being wasted when the narrator comments on
the characters actions. For example he might comment something small like “Whoa
that’s weird!” This type of thing makes me not want to read the book which
relates back to Wieners argument.
I also agree with Weiner. I think a book is better if the main character is likeable.
ReplyDeleteI really LOVE the layout of your blog! Also I love how you quoted something from the book, it hints the type of author
ReplyDelete